The New York Times’ 1619 Project is one of America’s most historically perverse racial projects. It not only lies about American history; it also masquerades as academic justification for the Cancel America movement.
Professor Wilfred Reilly of Kentucky State University recently exposed the project’s intellectual dishonesty in his recent essay for RealClearPublicAffairs. “Popular left-wing models of historical education, regularly make claims about further injustices and atrocities that are simply not based in reality,” he wrote.
According to Reilly, the 1619 Project’s inaccuracies include manifestations that simply aren’t true—such as the idea that the American Revolution was fought to preserve slavery. History shows that taxation, the Intolerable Acts and more were the catalysts for the Revolutionary War and, furthermore, “England did not free slaves in her overseas colonies until 1833.”
Reilly takes issue with propagandization of history and reasons, “A coherent education in history and civics must involve studying one’s society neither as blemish-free nor as virtually ‘all warts,’ but rather comprehensively and honestly.”
The “woke” portrayal of American history is indeed “excessively and misleadingly negative” and this negativism ignores the accomplishments of our Civil War to end slavery, our defeat of Nazism, and our development of life-sustaining technologies used around the globe.
But an accurate portrayal of American history would undermine the radical left’s justification for cancelling America. By framing America’s past as irredeemably and “systemically” racist, the 1619 Project provides academic cover the violence waged on American streets by radical groups like Black Lives Matter.
Cancel America’s great lie is the idea that America is not worth defending and to sell this lie the story of America’s goodness must be erased. Clearly, the 1619 Project’s end goal is to create generations who no longer believe America is Good, and will vote accordingly.
Recent Comments